Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05515
Original file (BC 2012 05515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05515

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She received a UOTHC discharge on 8 Feb 62 solely due to her sexual orientation.  She served honorably before being removed from service.  The current DoD policy has opened the path for correction of this injustice from 50 years ago.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered the Air Force on 17 Nov 59.

On 8 Feb 62, the applicant was furnished an UOTHC discharge, with a reason for separation of “257,” a Reentry (RE) Code of “2,” and was credited with 2 years, 2 months, and 22 days of active service.   

On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).”  In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge (the change should be to “Secretarial Authority”), requests to re-characterize the discharge to honorable, and/or request a change to the RE to an immediately-eligible-to-reenter category when both of the following conditions are met: (1) the original discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to enactment of DADT and (2) there were no aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct.  Although each request must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, the award of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge should normally be considered to indicate the absence of aggravating factors.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  The applicant is requesting her UOTHC discharge be upgraded based on the repeal of DADT.  No evidence has been presented which would lead us to believe her discharge was improper or contrary to the directive under which it was affected at the time of her separation.  However, in light of the repeal of DADT, it would be appropriate to upgrade the applicant’s UOTHC discharge, change the narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority,” and correct her separation program designator (SPD) and reentry (RE) codes accordingly.  In accordance with Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) guidance memorandum, Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, United States Code, dated 20 September 2011, Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for a discharge (the change should be to “Secretarial Authority” and SPD code KFF)), requests to recharacterize the discharge to honorable, and/or requests to change the RE code to an immediately-eligible-to-reenter category (the new RE code should be RE code 1J) when both of the following conditions are met: (1) the original discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to enactment of DADT and (2) there were no aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct.  The award of an honorable or general discharge should normally be considered to indicate the absence of aggravating factors.  Based on our review of the evidence of record, the applicant’s discharge meets these requirements.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 8 February 1962, she received an Honorable discharge with a reason for separation of “Secretarial Authority” rather than “AFR 39-17,” a separation program designator (SPD) code of “KFF” rather than “257,” and a reentry (RE) code of “1J” rather than “2.”

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05515 in Executive Session on 22 Oct 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Nov 12, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.




			
			Panel Chair 





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2011-00378 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00378 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be replaced with one that will allow him to reenlist. On 10 September 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OSD-P&R) released guidance pertaining to the correction of military records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04486

    Original file (BC-2011-04486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After considering all the evidence, the board found that she did commit homosexual acts and recommended she be separated with an honorable discharge. Her discharge from the Air Force was legally sufficient based on current policy at the time of her discharge making her narrative reason for separation an appropriate reason for discharge. Therefore, the Board majority recommends the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01201

    Original file (BC-2011-01201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01201 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to: 1. In accordance with Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) guidance memorandum, Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, United States Code, dated 20 September 2011,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00134

    Original file (BC-2012-00134.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00134 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to General. In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00160

    Original file (BC-2012-00160.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to reflect honorable. On 11 Oct 83, the applicant was notified by her squadron commander that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for homosexuality. The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00438

    Original file (BC 2014 00438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00438 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “HRB” (homosexual conduct-statement) and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge) be changed to allow her to rejoin the Air Force. Although the discharge was properly processed according to the applicable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02641

    Original file (BC-2012-02641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02641 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) Her records changed to reflect her married name. She received a narrative reason for separation of “Homosexual Admission.” On 16 October 2012, AFPC/DPSIRP notified the applicant that in accordance with AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03062

    Original file (BC 2014 03062.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).” Effective 20 Sept 11, Service DRBs should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for a discharge (the change should be “Secretarial Authority” (Separation Program Designator Code (SPD) code JFF)), requests to re-characterize the discharge to honorable,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02279

    Original file (BC-2012-02279.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends approval, indicating the applicant’s service characterization should be corrected to reflect “Honorable” and the narrative reason for separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority”. The Department of Defense...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 02621 2

    Original file (BC 2007 02621 2.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with Exhibits, at Exhibit F. On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, the law commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).” In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense...